Unni Krishnan Case (1993) – Article 21 & Right to Education

Learn about the Unni Krishnan case (1993), where the Supreme Court held that the right to life under Article 21 includes the fundamental right to education.

#Unni Krishnan case#Right to Education#Article 21#Supreme Court cases#constitutional law

Article Info

4 min
Reading Time
3
Views
Oct 1
Published
Landmark Cases
Category

Frequently Asked Questions

1What was the Unni Krishnan case about?
It involved challenges to regulation of private colleges and raised the question of whether the right to education is part of Article 21.
2What did the Supreme Court decide in Unni Krishnan?
The Court held that the right to education is implicit in the right to life under Article 21 and free education must be provided up to age 14.
3How did Unni Krishnan expand Article 21?
It declared education a fundamental right, linking dignity and democracy to access to education.
4What is the connection between Unni Krishnan and Article 21A?
The case laid the foundation for Article 21A, which made free and compulsory education a constitutional right through the 86th Amendment.
5Why is the Unni Krishnan case important for students?
It is a key precedent in the evolution of socio-economic rights and is frequently asked in law exams and judiciary preparation.
S
Simple Legal Language
Author

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Related Articles